See. Play. Live.

by Danny Kim

Smart People Aren’t Elitist – They’re Naive and Misunderstood

During my time at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology – a selective STEM magnet school in northern Virginia and the #1 public high school in the US from 2006-2011, colloquially referred to as “TJ” -, one of the terms I frequently heard used to describe its student body was “elitist”. Just look at the comments attached to any of The Washington Post‘s articles on the school online; sometimes, it seems like the word is used to describe the institution just as much as “prestigious” or “rigorous”. And beyond the realm of TJ, the E-word seems to be used far too frequently in reference to the intelligent and educated, to those who possess knowledge that others do not.

But why? Why are smart people so often referred to as elitist? Yeah, sure, there’s the occasional arrogant prick who legitimately deserves the title, but as for the rest of them… what did they do? What did they do to deserve to be called elitists besides 1) be born into existence, in the case of those society likes to refer to as “gifted”; or 2) work their asses off to increase their intellect?

It’s rare that smart people ever call themselves smart. If anything, the adjective is hoisted upon them by others. To quote Adam Jensen of Deus Ex – Human Revolution: “I never asked for this.” – smart people never asked to be called “smart” or “gifted,” it’s just what everyone else calls them. There’s a reason that smart kids awkwardly walk out of the classroom for their Gifted and Talented sections in elementary school. There’s a reason that smart kids at top ranked schools are sometimes hesitant to say what schools they go to. There’s a reason that when people point out their intellect in a social situation, they smile sheepishly and just thank whoever it is that gave them the compliment.

Being called smart separates a person from the norm, and smart people ultimately just want to fit in.

It’s funny how society put this label of “smart” on certain people to separate them, but then judges them for the very label it puts on them. It attaches adjectives like “intelligent” and “gifted” to these people, then when these so-labeled “smart people” embrace this label and the opportunities it opens up for them and try to make full use of it (going to prestigious schools for example), society calls them elitist. What are they supposed to do, act embarrassed, shout, “OH NO NO NO, I’M NOT SMART!” and denounce their abilities? They never asked anyone to label them separately, but society itself put this label on them, and they’ve accepted it. Now don’t judge them for it.

It’s important to realize that society’s tendency to label and separate smart people is actually what ends up reinforcing smart people’s naiveté, the very naiveté that later indirectly causes society to call them elitist. While people naturally surround themselves with others they are similar to in some way, it seems like society wants to formalize this process for smart kids starting at an early age by pushing them into Gifted or Honors classes or institutions like TJ. Why? For parents – the hand of society in a weird way if you think about it, shaping the future – , this formal “stamp of approval” is a chip on their shoulder. It isn’t good enough that their kid is gifted – they have to be officially recognized for it. Yes, there’s some truth to the fact that your alma mater serves as a “billboard” for you for the rest of your life, but an even bigger truth is that if one is truly gifted, his passions and talents will manifest in a way that will lead him to success regardless of anything else – should genius be real, genius will prevail.

But no one ever thinks of this, that recognition isn’t important, that smarts are smarts fuck all what anyone else thinks, and this craving for official recognition of intelligence leads parents to try to push their kids into advanced and/or prestigious academic programs as early and as much as possible, regardless of whether it is a good fit for the kids or not (a topic worthy of an entire separate article). And the time spent in the bubbles of Gifted and Honors classes and schools like TJ serves as an incubator for smart people’s misguided socio-intellectual view, the very view that leads people to believe that they are elitist – being surrounded by people of the same capacity as them starting at an early age reinforces smart kids’ mistaken beliefs that their capacity and abilities are normal, that they are just normal and average.

And because they think of themselves as average, no different from anyone else, smart people at a young age are often surprised or frustrated when others fail to display the same capacity that they do, something that happens when they interact over a period of time with those outside of their immediate social circles or, more typically, are kicked out of their bubbles into the real world (usually in the form of going to college). In situations like this, the quickest of the smart kids use their social abilities to turn attention away from themselves and mask their surprise and frustration with pedagogy - no problem, lemme show you - and flattery - yeah, you got it!. But the rest of them, they’re caught off guard by their purely innocent misestimation of others’ abilities and end up dealing with an awkward silence or repeating high-level instructions where detailed low-level instructions are necessary. And the worst? The less empathetic/less socially capable smart ones visibly get pissed, not at the person as some may believe, but at the situation - I can do it and this person’s no different from me, so what’s wrong? As you can hopefully tell, none of this is because smart people believe they’re better than anyone else -

It’s because they don’t know better. Smart people are really quite stupid in their own way. They’re slow to realize their capacity, and because they think of themselves as average, they naively expect everyone to know and understand most everything they themselves do. They’re unable to realize that their abilities are exceptional, that others may not possess the talents they have, and because of this, they don’t realize that by holding others to the same standard as themselves, they hold them to an unintentionally high standard.

I’d be lying if I said that this youthful socio-intellectual naiveté couldn’t serve as the seed of actual elitism. Indeed, it’s the rare case of being unable to grow out of this naiveté and the naiveté manifesting itself in other ways that leads to true elitism and an inability to understand the perspectives and circumstances of others - I didn’t do anything special, I just worked hard to get here, why can’t everyone else? says the CEO raised in a rich WASP neighborhood to the inner-city youth.

But thankfully, for most smart people, the naiveté is just a product of youth, of not enough life and people experience, lasting through the teenage years and maybe early adulthood. Once exposed to the real world and after meeting different people from different backgrounds, most smart kids are quick to realize the reality of their abilities. They become grateful for their smarts and the educational opportunities they had. They become smart, well-informed adults, and thanks to their new awareness, they become more understanding of others and are able to fit in with them better.

And that’s just what they wanted: to fit in.

2 Responses to “Smart People Aren’t Elitist – They’re Naive and Misunderstood”

  1. tjgrad says:

    With all due respect, I find it hard to take this post seriously. I just find it really silly to apply general characteristics to “smart people.” I don’t really know where to start; I just don’t find this topic necessary. I mean, who is “smart?” To someone that doesn’t come from a school like TJ, you might appear as elitist just from reading this post. I don’t think that, but the way that you label and talk about “smart people” really IMO, if it makes any sense, comes off as elitist as a humble way.

    I mean, who is “smart?” You’re talking as if there is a clear, distinct way of telling who is smart, and who isn’t. (GT vs. regular classes). How do you define smart? Being good at math? How about what school you go to? I go to a school that isn’t exactly known for it’s general academics, but it definitely has its fair share of bright students. Heck, back at TJ, even though all students were qualified academically, I’ve seen some that I thought weren’t too bright to put it nicely….I guess what I want to say is that “smart people” aren’t that hard to come across…hence why you can’t describe them..

    Besides the other generalizations you made (like smart people are really quite stupid in their own way, or smart people just want to fit in), the one other thing that bugged me was the point with the Deus Ex quote. Smart isn’t something that society can label…it’s just something that someone is, or isn’t. I don’t know how else I can say it. It never came across to me as a “label.” You’re talking as if being smart is unacceptable or embarrassing…it’s reminding me of x-men and similar superheros: “oh no, I have these incredibly bad-ass powers…I just want to be normal…”

    As for TJ being elitist, I could see how people could see that. IMO, it’s the combination of ridiculous school spirit and teenagers being immature/bratty…I think many times, when a news article was written about TJ (whether positive, neutral, or negative), the student body, parents, maybe faculty (not sure, but basically the TJ community) in general reacted poorly. The one that I remember the most clearly is the Washingtonian article “Why you need to hate this school,” something like that. The general outburst against the title IMO was pretty much overzealous and immature. People were demanding that the writer apologize, which I think he actually did. Another incident was when WUSA9 said something about incoming freshman receiving new iPads…the outcry was unbelievably annoying & bratty..most of it was centered around a select few, I think, and I won’t be surprised if TJ did come off as elitist…guess that’s why you need to watch what you say when part of a community like this.

    Sorry if this is hard to read and if I came across as insulting. I tried to tone it down but still keep my point.

    • Lencias says:

      No worries. Thanks for reading and for the great comment. You make a lot of valid points that I actually agree with, and I’ll try to respond without going off on too long a spiel any one topic, haha. XD

      - I’m not saying anything in this piece is fact; it’s all opinion/hypothesis based on my own experiences and observations, and I feel like generalizations are inevitable when it comes to opinions. I guess I could’ve made the opinionated nature of this piece clearer – I just had “Don’t use ‘I think’” in your writing” drilled into me in grade school, that’s all, heh.

      - I thought that a lot of people must’ve had the very realizations I talk about in the piece (which is why I chose to write about it), and based on feedback, it seems like I wasn’t too far off the mark. I firmly believe that it’s important to be able to see things from different perspectives and that this piece is just an expression of a not-uncommon, but rarely actually expressed, perspective. But I can see how this piece might come off as elitist itself; in fact, it was a big concern as I wrote. As such, I tried my best to write from a distanced viewpoint, as just a result of so much time spent around a lot of really brilliant people.

      - Yep, no real specific definition for “smart”, but I guess in this context I lean more toward the traditional academic distinction. And you’re right, smart is something you either are or you’re not. But to have it pointed out constantly – in effect making it a label – is entirely something else. I only labeled “smart people” separately here, because, well, it was necessary to make the point I was making. Being smart itself isn’t inconvenient in any way; having people singling you out by constantly pointing it out is.

      - You’re right that teenage brattiness does not help TJ’s elitist rep at all. But eventually, most of us grow out of it (frankly, a lot of kids seem super jaded about TJ by the time they graduate), and any boastful arrogance kinda ends up backfiring at some point because we realize people look at us differently when we say we went to TJ; we become reluctant – at least, I did – to say that we went to TJ. Telling someone you go to/went to TJ becomes in some ways a smaller version of the “H-Bomb” – I jokingly refer to TJ’s version as “dropping the T-bomb.” One of my wisest friends in retrospect is one who told me back toward the end of senior year that he was reluctant to tell people where he’d be going to school because people would always look at him differently when he told them that he was going to… Yale. Same thing with TJ after the first year or two. The “T-Bomb effect” is a large part of what I talk about in the piece.

      - The Deus Ex quote I included because I’ve always loved the quote and it felt relevant as I was writing XP

      Anyway, seriously: thanks for the awesome comment. **Flame jacket off** ;D

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>